دوورەزانی

دوورە زانی، دوورە ھەستکردن، یان تێلێپاتی (لە تۆنانی کۆنەوە τῆλε، تێلێ واتە «دوور» و πάθος/-πάθεια، پاتۆس یان -پاتیا واتە «ھەستکردن، پێزانین، بەسۆز، سەختی، ئەزموون»)^[٣]^[٤] گواستنەوەی زانیارییە لە کەسێکەوە بۆ کەسێکی تر بەبێ بەکارھێنانی ڕێڕەوە ھەستییەکانی مرۆڤ و بەبێ بوونی پەیوەندی جەستەیی.

تاقیکردنەوەی دوورە زانییەکان ڕەخنەیان لێگیراوە لەبەر نەبوونی ڕاگیرکاری و دووبارە بوونەوەیان. ھیچ بەڵگەیەکی باش نییە کە بیسەلمێنێت کە دوورە زانی دیاردەیەکی ڕاستی بێت، و بابەتەکە لە کۆمەڵەی زانستیدا زۆرینەی کات بە زڕزانست دانراوە. .^[٥]^[٦]^[٧]^[٨]

سەرچاوەکان[دەستکاری]

^ Marks, David; Kammann, Richard. (2000). The Psychology of the Psychic. Prometheus Books. pp. 97-106. ISBN 1573927988
^ Hyman, Ray. Evaluating Parapsychological Claims. In Robert J. Sternberg, Henry L. Roediger, Diane F. Halpern. (2007). Critical Thinking in Psychology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 216-231. ISBN 9780521608343
^ Telepathy. CollinsDictionary.com. Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 11th Edition. Retrieved December 06, 2012.
^ Following the model of sympathy and empathy.
^ Felix Planer. (1980). Superstition. Cassell. p. 218. ISBN 0304306916 "Many experiments have attempted to bring scientific methods to bear on the investigation of the subject. Their results based on literally millions of tests, have made it abundantly clear that there exists no such phenomenon as telepathy, and that the seemingly successful scores have relied either on illusion, or on deception."
^ Jan Dalkvist (1994). Telepathic Group Communication of Emotions as a Function of Belief in Telepathy. Dept. of Psychology, Stockholm University. Retrieved 5 October 2011. Within the scientific community however, the claim that psi anomalies exist or may exist is in general regarded with skepticism. One reason for this difference between the scientist and the non scientist is that the former relies on his own experiences and anecdotal reports of psi phenomena, whereas the scientist at least officially requires replicable results from well controlled experiments to believe in such phenomena - results which according to the prevailing view among scientists, do not exist.
^ Willem B. Drees (28 November 1998). Religion, Science and Naturalism. Cambridge University Press. pp. 242–. ISBN 978-0-521-64562-1. Retrieved 5 October 2011. Let me take the example of claims in parapsychology regarding telepathy across spatial or temporal distances, apparently without a mediating physical process. Such claims are at odds with the scientific consensus.
^ Spencer Rathus. (2011). Psychology: Concepts and Connections. Cengage Learning. p. 143. ISBN 9781111344856 "There is no adequate scientific evidence that people can read other people's minds. Research has not identified one single indisputable telepath or clairvoyant."

بەستەرە دەرەکییەکان[دەستکاری]

جادووگەرە ھەستییەکە ٢٠ی تەممووزی ٢٠٢١ لە وەیبەک مەشین، ئەرشیڤ کراوە. - بڕوس ھوود
دوورە زانی - فەرھەنگی سکێپتیک
تاقیکردنەوەی سۆوڵ-گۆڵدنی - ھەڵسەنگاندنێکی ڕەخنەییی تاقیکردنەوەی سۆوڵ-گۆڵدنی، کە ھەوڵی بەڕاست سەلماندنی دوورە زانی دابوو
خەون و دوورە زانی ١ی تشرینی یەکەمی ٢٠١١ لە وەیبەک مەشین، ئەرشیڤ کراوە. - پەڕەیەک لە زانست و دەروون شیکاری

دەروازەی دەروونناسی

[1] Marks, David; Kammann, Richard. (2000). The Psychology of the Psychic. Prometheus Books. pp. 97-106. ISBN 1573927988

[2] Hyman, Ray. Evaluating Parapsychological Claims. In Robert J. Sternberg, Henry L. Roediger, Diane F. Halpern. (2007). Critical Thinking in Psychology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 216-231. ISBN 9780521608343

[3] Telepathy. CollinsDictionary.com. Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 11th Edition. Retrieved December 06, 2012.

[4] Following the model of sympathy and empathy.

[Planer1980-5] Felix Planer. (1980). Superstition. Cassell. p. 218. ISBN 0304306916 "Many experiments have attempted to bring scientific methods to bear on the investigation of the subject. Their results based on literally millions of tests, have made it abundantly clear that there exists no such phenomenon as telepathy, and that the seemingly successful scores have relied either on illusion, or on deception."

[Dalkvist1994-6] Jan Dalkvist (1994). Telepathic Group Communication of Emotions as a Function of Belief in Telepathy. Dept. of Psychology, Stockholm University. Retrieved 5 October 2011. Within the scientific community however, the claim that psi anomalies exist or may exist is in general regarded with skepticism. One reason for this difference between the scientist and the non scientist is that the former relies on his own experiences and anecdotal reports of psi phenomena, whereas the scientist at least officially requires replicable results from well controlled experiments to believe in such phenomena - results which according to the prevailing view among scientists, do not exist.

[Drees1998-7] Willem B. Drees (28 November 1998). Religion, Science and Naturalism. Cambridge University Press. pp. 242–. ISBN 978-0-521-64562-1. Retrieved 5 October 2011. Let me take the example of claims in parapsychology regarding telepathy across spatial or temporal distances, apparently without a mediating physical process. Such claims are at odds with the scientific consensus.

[8] Spencer Rathus. (2011). Psychology: Concepts and Connections. Cengage Learning. p. 143. ISBN 9781111344856 "There is no adequate scientific evidence that people can read other people's minds. Research has not identified one single indisputable telepath or clairvoyant."

[١]

[٢]

[٣]

[٤]

[٥]

[٦]

[٧]

[٨]